Anthropic didn't violate U.S. copyright law when the AI company used millions of legally purchased books to train its chatbot ...

A judge ruled the Anthropic artificial intelligence company didn't violate copyright laws when it used millions of ...

In a test case for the artificial intelligence industry, a federal judge has ruled that AI company Anthropic didn’t break the ...

A federal judge has sided with Anthropic in an AI copyright case, ruling that training — and only training — its AI models on ...

Tech companies are celebrating a major ruling on fair use for AI training, but a closer read shows big legal risks still lay ...

While the startup has won its "fair use" argument, it potentially faces billions of dollars in damages for allegedly pirating ...

The decision is among the first to find that use of books for AI model training is legal under U.S. copyright law.

AI companies argue that their systems make fair use of copyrighted material to create new, transformative content.

The ruling isn't a guarantee for how similar cases will proceed, but it lays the foundations for a precedent that would side ...

A federal judge in San Francisco ruled late on Monday that Anthropic's use of books without permission to train its ...

Siding with tech companies on a pivotal question for the AI industry, the judge said Anthropic made “fair use” of books by ...

A pivotal US court ruling declared Anthropic's AI training on copyrighted books as fair use, marking a significant win for ...