A recent report by Lee & Gallucci [40] compared the operator's preference of digital versus conventional implant impression techniques. In this in vitro study, inexperienced students made impressions ...
Medline, Cochrane, Science Direct, Scopus and Embase were electronically searched and complemented with hand searches. Studies published from 1955 to July 2016 were considered. Clinical studies ...
In this clinical trial, according to the clinical scenario, the digital impression technique was more efficient than the conventional impression technique. Thus, the first null hypothesis was rejected ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results